本文已被:浏览 2848次 下载 3568次
投稿时间:2014-09-07 修订日期:2014-09-07
投稿时间:2014-09-07 修订日期:2014-09-07
中文摘要: 随着地浸技术的发展,一些新工艺很难简单地用传统的酸、碱分类方法进行界定,出现工艺归类与地浸实际工作状态不一致的现象,也造成了技术交流的不便。在综述目前主要地浸工艺及其铀迁移原理的基础上,对地浸采铀工艺分类方法进行了探讨,提出了分别以地浸工作液pH和浸出铀的迁移形式为依据的分类方法。
Abstract:With development of technology of in-situ leaching uranium mining, it is difficult to define some new techniques by traditional classification methods by which the in-situ leaching techniques are grouped into acid leaching and alkaline leaching. Confusion and inconvenience occur during technological and academic exchanges due to inconsistencies between classification and actual in-situ leaching conditions. Based on the review of main techniques of in-situ leaching and uranium migration theory, the classification methods of in-situ leaching uranium mining technique were discussed, and improved classification methods were proposed based on pH value of leaching solution and migration form of dissolved uranium respectively.
keywords: in-situ leaching uranium mining technology classification acid in-situ leaching alkaline in-situ leaching neutral in-situ leaching
文章编号: 中图分类号:TD868 文献标志码:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40872165);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2012CB723101)
Author Name | Affiliation | |
ZHOU Yipeng | East China Institute of Technology | zyp721@163.com |
SHEN Zhaoli | ||
SHI Weijun | ||
SUN Zhanxue | ||
LIU Jinhui | ||
LIU Yajie |
引用文本:
周义朋,沈照理,史维浚,孙占学,刘金辉,刘亚洁.地浸采铀工艺分类方法的探讨[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2015(1):37-41.
ZHOU Yipeng,SHEN Zhaoli,SHI Weijun,SUN Zhanxue,LIU Jinhui,LIU Yajie.Discussion on Technology Classification of In-situ Leaching Uranium Mining[J].Nonferrous Metals (Extractive Metallurgy),2015(1):37-41.
周义朋,沈照理,史维浚,孙占学,刘金辉,刘亚洁.地浸采铀工艺分类方法的探讨[J].有色金属(冶炼部分),2015(1):37-41.
ZHOU Yipeng,SHEN Zhaoli,SHI Weijun,SUN Zhanxue,LIU Jinhui,LIU Yajie.Discussion on Technology Classification of In-situ Leaching Uranium Mining[J].Nonferrous Metals (Extractive Metallurgy),2015(1):37-41.